Trump Picks Popular Fox News Host for TOP Position
Washington D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to reevaluate a longstanding immigration policy that denied asylum seekers entry at ports along the southern U.S. border. President Donald Trump requested the justices to review a Ninth Circuit ruling that deemed the policy unlawful.
The Biden administration terminated the practice referred to by the government as “metering.” The Trump administration seeks to maintain flexibility while intensifying its immigration enforcement efforts.
U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer stated that the Constitution assigns authority to regulate the border to the political branches rather than the judiciary. He argued that the lower court decision improperly undermines Congress’s authority to establish asylum policy and encroaches upon the executive branch’s authority to regulate the nation’s borders.
The nonprofit immigrant rights organization Al Otro Lado, along with 13 asylum seekers who initiated the lawsuit in 2017, expressed support for the Ninth Circuit’s ruling. They argued that the government’s turnback policy was an unlawful strategy to evade obligations by physically obstructing asylum seekers at ports of entry.
Sauer stated that according to the rationale of the lower court decision, Customs and Border Patrol was prohibited from obstructing the entry of an individual who arrived at the border without a prior appointment. An alien could assert arrival in the United States, necessitating inspection and processing of an asylum application.
The asylum seekers contested the government’s petition, asserting that the appellate court’s decision pertained solely to a specific group of migrants. Kelsi Brown Corkran, an attorney with the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law, stated that while the current administration’s border policies are subject to impending legal challenges, none of the plaintiffs’ assertions hinge on the issue raised by the petition.
The Justice Department refrained from commenting on the Supreme Court’s decision to consider its appeal. The White House directed inquiries regarding the reinstatement of the metering policy to the Department of Homeland Security.
The Immigration and Nationality Act stipulates that individuals in the United States, irrespective of their location, have the right to apply for asylum if they can establish a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country.
The policy was first implemented under the Obama administration in response to an influx of Haitian asylum seekers. The Trump administration later formalized and expanded it. The Biden administration ended the practice in 2021.
The Supreme Court’s review could have significant implications for future border enforcement and asylum processing. The case highlights ongoing debates over executive authority in immigration matters and the balance between humanitarian obligations and border security.
BOMBSHELL — Senate Votes 50-49 on SAVE America Act
THE RECONCILIATION SHOWDOWN: SAVE America Act Secures Historical Senate Majority in Late-Night Vote-a-Rama, Exposing Radical Procedural Rift
WASHINGTON, D.C. — JUNE 9, 2026 — The high-stakes legislative trench warfare over the future of American election security has just experienced a seismic shift, culminating in a dramatic late-night showdown that shattered partisan fault lines on Capitol Hill.
What happens when an unyielding election integrity package secures a historic, raw majority in the United States Senate, yet remains aggressively bottlenecked by entrenched procedural rules? For advocates of absolute border and ballot verification, the answer is an agonizing turning point. The SAVE America Act has officially secured majority support in the U.S. Senate during a high-velocity, late-night voting session on Thursday—marking a monumental victory for election integrity advocates despite falling short of the strict 60 votes required to dismantle Senate procedural hurdles.
The high-threshold clash detonated during the Senate’s grueling marathon “vote-a-rama” session on June 4. Moving with absolute administrative lethality, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) forcefully maneuvered to lock down a clean vote on the House-passed version of the SAVE America Act. The sweeping legislation would mandate strict documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for all federal voter registrations and aggressively fortify voter identification requirements nationwide.
I. THE BUDGETARY BARRICADE: THE 50-49 TALLY
When the dust settled in the chamber, the amendment successfully passed by a definitive vote of 50-49, sending shockwaves through the progressive wing by giving the hardline measure an authentic majority in the upper house.
However, because the proposal was introduced as a waiver to stringent budget rules within the complex reconciliation process, Senate rules mandated a three-fifths supermajority—an absolute 60-vote threshold—for formal adoption. In a calculated display of total partisan obstruction, every single Senate Democrat voted in lockstep against the amendment, successfully preventing it from reaching the necessary numbers for passage.
Despite being blocked, the final 50-49 count represents a spectacular operational improvement from an earlier election-integrity amendment pushed by Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Graham's previous proposal had crashed in a humiliating 48-50 defeat after four high-profile Republican senators crossed the aisle to join Democrats in active opposition.
II. THE DEFECTION MATRIX AND COLLINS’ REVERSAL
The strategic differences between the two amendments reveal a calculated internal maneuvering within the Republican conference. Graham’s broader, more complex proposal included sweeping, additional provisions that went far beyond the clean, House-passed version of the SAVE Act—including controversial restrictions regarding transgender athletes' participation in sports.
That added weight initially alienated key centrist Republicans. Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina all voted to kill Graham’s version.
However, the political equation altered permanently when Lee isolated the legislation down to the clean House bill. Confronted with the unadulterated text, Collins executed a rapid tactical shift, abandoning the holdouts to join the rest of the unified Republican conference in absolute support of the measure.
In contrast, Murkowski, McConnell, and Tillis dug in their heels, continuing to oppose the clean amendment even as it surged to its final 50-49 victory.
THE MATRICES OF THE CONGESTED SENATE LEDGER
* THE CLEAN BALLOT SURGE: Senator Mike Lee commands a 50-49 majority victory.
* THE TIE-BREAKER PROTOCOL: Vice President JD Vance stood ready to cast the 51st vote.
* THE CENTRIST REVISION: Susan Collins switches to "YES" on the clean House version.
* THE IMMIGRATION CASUALTY: $70 Billion border security bill advances stripped of the SAVE Act.
The final 50-49 tally mathematically demonstrates that supporters of the SAVE Act can officially assemble a functional Senate majority behind the legislation, even if they lack the supermajority dictated by current Senate rules.
Furthermore, Vice President JD Vance—who serves as President of the Senate and holds the constitutional power to cast tie-breaking votes—was physically available in the chamber if needed, meaning supporters effectively proved they could command 51 votes in favor of the security transformation.
III. THE FILIBUSTER EMERGENCY: THUNE EXPOSES THE WALL
Supporters of the legislation argue with data-driven precision that requiring documentary proof of citizenship via birth certificates or passports is the ultimate mechanism to ensure only eligible citizens participate in federal contests, instantly spiking public confidence in election outcomes.
Unsurprisingly, the SAVE America Act has transformed into one of the Republican Party’s absolute top priorities heading into the volatile 2026 midterm elections, backed by intense endorsements from President Donald Trump, Vice President Vance, and conservative advocacy groups. Conversely, unified progressive opponents claim that existing legal frameworks already stop non-citizens from voting, arguing that additional paperwork mandates create unfair barriers for eligible voters.
The high-stakes voting session has also intensely magnified the nationwide debate surrounding the controversial Senate filibuster. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has frequently cited the 60-vote cloture requirement as the supreme, unyielding obstacle preventing the passage of critical election-related legislation, noting that Democrats remain completely unified in blocking the measure.
THE FINAL VERDICT
Thursday night’s vote-a-rama reinforced that cold institutional reality. Although the America First coalition successfully captured a true majority of the chamber, they remained exactly 10 votes short of the threshold required to overcome procedural objections and permanently attach the voting limits to the broader reconciliation package.
As a direct consequence, lawmakers expect the underlying, massive $70 billion immigration enforcement and border security legislation to advance through the pipeline without the SAVE Act provisions included in the final text.
Still, Republicans have quickly weaponized the 50-49 tally as definitive evidence that the legislation enjoys majority support within the Senate. The outcome places renewed, high-threshold attention on Senate rules and whether Republican lawmakers will seek alternative, aggressive strategies to bypass the filibuster in the future. For now, the SAVE America Act remains procedurally blocked—but the political warfare over who controls the rules of American voting has just entered a dangerous new phase.
BIG UPDATE — The Entire Election Just Flipped After a Brand New Report Finds That Republicans Are Now Surging In Generi...
THE MIDTERM SHOCKWAVE: Zogby Poll Exposes Near Generic Tie as RNC Greenlights Norm-Shattering 'Trump-a-Palooza' Convention
WASHINGTON, D.C. — June 9, 2026 — The tectonic plates of the 2026 midterm landscape have just suffered a massive, unexpected shift, vaporizing legacy establishment expectations and plunging Washington into a state of absolute strategic panic.
What happens when a ruling party's comfortable defensive cushion completely evaporates months before a critical vote, while the opposition prepares a historic, rules-shattering national rally? For the political status quo, the answer is an immediate, high-threshold crisis. A major new survey from Zogby Strategies has delivered a stunning update that is sending shockwaves through the capital, revealing that Republicans have surged to within a razor-thin statistical tie against Democrats on the generic congressional ballot.
With only months left before voters head to the polls, the Real Polling in Real Time survey exposes a dead-heat race that has political analysts scrambling. The raw data confirms that Democrats hold a narrow 46.3% share, while Republicans have charged forward to capture 45.8%—leaving the entire landscape locked in a statistical tie well within the poll's margin of error. This represents a dramatic, high-velocity turnaround from February, when Democrats enjoyed a commanding +5 point lead. Analysts now describe the race as an absolute toss-up, raising immediate, high-threshold alarms for the Democratic Party while a newly confident GOP fiercely positions itself to defend its Senate majority and capitalize on a slim House edge.
I. THE ISSUE MATRIX: GOP DOMINATES CORE SURGES
The underlying data from Zogby Strategies reveals that voters are shifting their trust heavily toward Republican priorities on the fundamental issues shaking everyday American households. While Democrats have managed to hold onto legacy advantages regarding healthcare with a +14 margin, affordability at +7, and middle-class needs at +6, the momentum is unmistakably pivoting toward the America First agenda.
The GOP has locked down dominant, double-digit, and single-digit margins on the cycle's most volatile battlegrounds. On the critical front of combating crime, the GOP holds a commanding +10 advantage. On border security and immigration, the Republican platform maintains a clear +7 lead. Furthermore, on issues of international strength and keeping the American Dream alive, the GOP has secured matching +3 point advantages over their Democratic counterparts.
GOP insiders point directly to this Zogby data as definitive proof that the electorate is responding positively to robust platforms centered on border security, public safety, and hardline strength abroad.
II. THE "TRUMP-A-PALOOZA" MANDATE: SHATTERING RNC TRADITION
The poll’s findings collide perfectly with a series of bold, unprecedented maneuvers by the Republican National Committee to completely electrify its grassroots base. In a swift, rule-breaking change, the RNC voted unanimously to officially greenlight its first-ever national convention during a midterm election year.
RNC Chairman Joe Gruters pulled no punches when describing the upcoming blockbuster gathering, branding it an absolute “Trump-a-palooza” engineered to fiercely showcase the Trump administration’s legislative and economic triumphs since reclaiming the White House. Gruters declared that this historic play is fundamentally about unity behind President Trump’s vision.
The midterm convention strategy sheet outlines a total departure from decades of political tradition:
The Origin: First proposed by President Donald J. Trump in September.
The Adoption: Passed unanimously by the RNC Rules Committee in Santa Barbara, California.
The Timing: Target window set to coincide with the RNC Summer Meeting, likely arriving in August.
The Logistical Core: Maximizing fundraising, spiking voter turnout, and securing absolute ballot integrity.
National conventions have historically been heavily guarded, exclusive assets reserved only for presidential election years. By unleashing a high-profile, presidential-style rally in the middle of the midterms, Republican leaders expect to completely neutralize the typical historical headwinds faced by the party in power.
III. THE CLASH OF THE CHAIRMEN
The sudden escalation has drawn fierce resistance from across the aisle. Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin pushed back sharply against the GOP's triumphalist narrative, claiming that President Trump’s approval ratings remain low due to lingering economic concerns.
Yet, the actual real-time numbers tell a far more complex story. The administrative lethality of the RNC's new rule change ensures that President Trump will have a massive, primetime megaphone to rally voters, explicitly focused on expanding congressional majorities and delivering an unyielding Republican Congress for his full four-year term.
THE FINAL VERDICT
As the countdown to the 2026 midterms accelerates, the potent combination of tightening poll numbers and a landmark, norm-shattering national convention signals a highly confident, completely energized Republican Party ready to build seamlessly on its 2024 victories.
The old-guard playbook is officially out the window. Democrats now face the brutal, uphill challenge of defending their legislative record while desperately trying to regain ground on the critical national security and economic frontiers where Republicans have now taken a decisive lead. With the generic ballot locked in a dead heat and the RNC preparing to launch its August offensive, the grand machinery of American politics is racing toward an unprecedented electoral collision.
