Stories
Jun 29, 2026

House Republicans Pass Massive Legislation That Will Prevent Elected Members And Staff From Betting On Prediction Markets

House Republicans have advanced legislation that would prohibit members of Congress and their immediate families from trading on prediction markets tied to elections and government actions.

The House Administration Committee voted along party lines Wednesday to approve the bill, sending it to the full House for consideration.

The legislation, introduced by House Administration Committee Chairman Rep. Bryan Steil, would bar lawmakers, their spouses, and dependent children from participating in Washington-focused prediction markets involving election outcomes or government decisions.

The proposal comes as lawmakers in both chambers have increased scrutiny of prediction markets amid concerns that members of Congress could profit from nonpublic information obtained through their official duties.

Those concerns intensified after several high-profile trades involving events such as the capture of then-Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, Google’s search results and developments related to the Iran conflict.

Earlier this year, the Senate unanimously adopted a resolution banning senators and Senate staff from participating in prediction markets altogether.

Unlike the Senate’s blanket prohibition, the House proposal is more narrowly focused on markets involving elections and government actions.

The committee vote exposed divisions over how broadly Congress should regulate prediction market activity.

Committee Republicans backed the legislation, arguing it addresses the appearance of conflicts of interest without unnecessarily restricting other forms of lawful wagering.

Committee Democrats opposed the measure, saying it leaves significant loopholes.

Rep. Joe Morelle, the committee’s ranking Democrat, argued the legislation does not go far enough.

“The Senate did it in a matter of minutes — no six-month grace period, no procedurally laborious process,” Morelle said.

“They just went to the floor with a two-page resolution and banned it all unanimously. We should do the same.”

Morelle criticized the House proposal as being “so filled with loopholes that it looks more like a sieve than a bill.”

Steil defended the legislation, arguing it appropriately targets markets where lawmakers could have access to information unavailable to the public.

He also questioned why a broader ban should prohibit family members from participating in sports-related prediction markets when they are already free to place similar wagers through sportsbooks or casinos.

Other posts